Ward Farnsworth – The Practicing Stoic: A Philosophical User’s Handbook Audio Book
I delight in evaluating excellent works like those of Seneca, Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus, Cicero, and likewise others, in addition to have actually constantly had an interest in the thinking of the Stoics. This book sets out the background and likewise perspective of the Stoics in a definitely clear in addition to quickly available method, without dumbing down the complexity. The body of work exists in an arranged, thoughtful structure that is seldom seen in this kind of publication. I found the reaction to queries that I didn’t understand I had. Ward Farnsworth – The Practicing Stoic Audiobook Free. I would definitely examine much of this product in the past, in the tasks by the specific authors, yet seeing this synthesis supplied me brand-new understanding in addition to understanding.
This, too, was a windfall for me. I was checking out the labyrinthine bookshelves at Powell’s in Portland this previous April in addition to found this. (There genuinely is something worrying having the ability to browse publications actually at a book store– it allows a lot more instantaneous connection/recognition, for approximate discoveries.) Unlike other books on Stoicism, this basically gathers and likewise arranges the preliminary resources (transformed, naturally) by theme, in an around modern-day way to assist finding. So the majority of the book consists of quotes from Seneca, Marcus Aurelius, Epictetus, and others (Cicero, Adam Smith, Montaigne, Johnson, in addition to numerous other “descendants” of the perspective), with concise and likewise fantastically useful remarks by the author to provide context and likewise describe the concepts involved.
Most likely due to the truth that I read this in tandem with Van Norden’s Intro to Classic Chinese Perspective and having actually submersed myself in the method of Buddhism (both Theravada and likewise Zen), I had the ability to see MANY resemblances amongst 3 incredibly various ancients viewpoints. I was particularly impressed by precisely how comparable Buddhist tenets are to Stoicism– generally, Stoicism plus meditative practice (not the pondering meditation of Marcus Aurelius, yet the “focus your concentrate on your breathing” kind of meditation) would almost comparable Buddhism (a minimum of as taught by Goenka or Stephen Batchelor): holding on to externals as the source of suffering/misery, the responsibility of one’s own judgment in establishing that incredibly suffering, the worth of detachment, viewpoint of brevity, the effort to see fact as it is, the support for issue and likewise “public life” (which can consist of just helping others), and so on. The remarkable coincidences among the 3 perspectives– in addition to below, I’m counting “traditional Chinese ideology” as one, however genuinely I desire Confucius/Mengzi and likewise Taoism as stated by Daodejing and Zhuangzi that do not specifically map onto Stoicism and Buddhism, however nonetheless share some actually interesting resemblances– advises to me something of thoughtful combining, which might consequently recommend something like truth, or a minimum of a technique or practical perspective that works to help ease human suffering. Ignore why it works, the idea of it– if an approach functions, it works.
As an individual that has in fact check out the works of the Stoics for numerous years, the residential or commercial property of this “handbook” struck me as incredibly useful. The book is prepared into subject- based chapters – “Viewpoint”, “Required”, “Difficulty”, “Death” and so on – with choices of Stoic authors on those topics ready with discourse in addition to context. This makes guide something that can be usefully check out best through, as I have in fact simply done, yet I acknowledge it will be one that I will go back to in addition to consult from regularly as those subjects establish in my life.
And likewise this teams up with the significance of Stoicism, which is not a collection of dogmas or mainly a mystical system, nevertheless a method to (attempt to) live your life. It fits with the ancient Greek understanding of technique not as an epistemology, yet as a method to pursue εὐδαιμονία – a great life, or growing life, actually “excellent spirit”. I take a look at Farnsworth’s manual while using Ryan Vacation and likewise Stephen Hanselman’s The Daily Stoic Journal: 366 Days of Composing and likewise Reflection on the Art of Living as well as both matched each other well. The effectiveness of Stoicism, with its exercises, day- to- day reflections and likewise a sense of a system that you strive to make use of even if you never ever absolutely master, is a strong element in Farnsworth’s discourse.
The last chapter, “Stoicism and likewise Its Motion picture critics”, was an excellent method to end guide. Once again, it exposes that Stocism is not dogmatic and is and should be open to objection both from within in addition to from outdoors. I just recently came across someone I comply with and likewise value on Twitter making some rather disparaging remarks concerning the modern-day renewal of Stoicism, declining Stoicism as a perspective for “a fairly satisfied individual”. This struck me as a rather weird description – there are lots of ways you can describe the Stoics, however “fairly satisfied” would definitely not be amongst them. When questioned, it ended up he was basing his conception of Stoicism on the truth that it has in fact become stylish just recently and likewise chosen with what he called “Davos types”. Why it has actually wound up being chosen keeping that type I have no idea – I think of in 2015 they were accepting the Danish idea of “hygge and likewise next year it will definitely be something else. Yet that does not in fact inform us a lot about Stoicism (any longer than its mysterious cultivating by Madonna notifies us a lot about Kabbala), considered that it’s not just “Davos kinds” that have an interest rate in Stocism.
A little a lot more excavating in addition to I situated his ridicule was based upon some unpredictable Roman chatter about Seneca’s organization endeavors and likewise a recommendation that he, as an abundant guy who was in addition a Stoic, was a hypocrite or somebody that utilized his technique to necessitate his riches. The Practicing Stoic Audiobook Online. Farnsworth reveals that Seneca in addition to the numerous other Stoic’s mindset to wealth was rather a lot more complex than that and, when in fact understood, weakens this criticism absolutely. To the Stoics wealth is neither inherently outstanding or bad and whether you have it (as Seneca and likewise Marcus Aurelius did) or do not (like Epictetus), the issue is additional how you concern it in addition to what you make with it in addition to why. This objection of Stoicism through Seneca and some rather minor Flavian damnatio memoriae (he was a consultant to the most resented member of the previous dynasty after all) returns to Macaulay developing on Francis Bacon in 1837 and since his disparaging remarks relate to all lots of 19th century gentlemen ever checked out of Seneca, the mud appears to have in fact stuck. Farnsworth goes a long method towards handling Macaulay’s sniffy terminations.